In the case of John Edwards, if he wants to spend private donations for hair cuts or mistresses, it's nobody's business but his and his donors. If Edwards misuses public money as part of the campaign process, it becomes a problem for everyone.
People say that private companies use campaign funds to "buy" politicians. Don't public funds do the same? I think that I would rather have a candidate that was "bought" by General Electric than by the Republican and Democratic national committees.
Campaign finance reform is set up by Republicans and Democrats to make sure that people of whom they don't approve cannot run realistic campaigns. The person down the street cannot use their own money, or that of friends and neighbors to start a political party or run for office. The incumbent can spend $billions of OUR money to put their name on buildings, airports and pork projects. They also use OUR money to send us annoying letters and post cards that tell us what a wonderful job they are doing. Public funding of campaigns and campaign finance reform destroy representative government as we know it.
The presidential campaign to receive federal matching funds in 2012 was the campaign of Buddy Roemer for President. According to the Buddy Roemer web site, he is a long shot candidate for the Republican nomination who has not participated in any debates or done any campaigning. In February, Buddy received his first installment of $100,000. As a Conscious Conservative, I believe that is a waste of taxpayers money.
No comments:
Post a Comment